Another FRQ attempt
Major points with facts?
Analyze how and why western European attitudes toward children and child-rearing
changed in the period from 1750 to 1900.
posted by Was @ 3:48 PM
Saturday, May 05, 2007
Analyze how and why western European attitudes toward children and child-rearing
changed in the period from 1750 to 1900.
Previous Posts
- Free Response Organization Practice
- Other AP Questions
- Another site
- Review for Renaissance and Reformation on the Cav...
- What questions do you have?
- Intellectual Revolution--Was's Postmodern Interpre...
- The Enlightenment Controversy
- Refocus--"The Scientific Revolution helped elevate...
- The Scientific Revolution, Intellectual Modernism
- The Age of Exploration
4 Comments:
alrightie lets see....
**Family Economy**
-Necessity in rural areas, even during Industrial Revolution (farm work)
-survival
**Nuisance and not needed**
-mainly Urban areas during Industrial Revolutions when abortions were frequent
-thorn in the side
>cost a lot to keep after children(goes back to abortion)
**Little Adults**
-Middle Class
>dressed like adults just smaller sizes
- No toys, did work, married young, went to school
>considered adult between ages 12-14?
not bad....good ideas
Upper Class:
-Not necessary
so they are just a huge and expensive pet peeve(hence high percentage of infancide)
Lower Class:
-Family totally depends on children, they ar needed to run the farm and they provide free labor.
-No emotional attachment incase of an incident where a child dies, so all their life they are treated like a factory worker w/o the hazrdous conditions and they at least have a roof over their heads
-being exploited at a young age(like factory workers) but necessary for the survival of the family (unlike factories with their huge labor pool, they could have just used women)
Monarchy:
Males necessary to be the heir to the throne, women? who cares?
*But that really is not anthing new
except the barrier of heir to the throne, the queen anyway
Post a Comment
<< Home